Ratings Methodology for Cryptocurrency Platforms
NerdWallet’s overall ratings for cryptocurrency platforms and exchanges are weighted averages of ratings in the following categories:
- 0.1 Data collection and review process
- 0.2 Information updates
- 0.3 Factor weightings
- 0.4 The review team Read more: Comment Investir en Crypto Monnaie ? | Guide Complet 2022
- 0.5 Minimum trade
- 0.6 Trading and transaction fees
- 0.7 Number of cryptocurrencies offered
- 0.8 Crypto-to-crypto trading pairs
- 0.9 Digital wallet options
- 0.10 Customer support options
- 1 Related
Data collection and review process
NerdWallet reviews 12 companies that provide the purchase and sale of cryptocurrencies to U.S. customers.
We collect data from providers and observe provider demonstrations, as necessary. Our process starts by sending detailed questionnaires to providers. The questionnaires are structured to equally elicit both favorable and unfavorable responses. They are not designed or prepared to produce any predetermined results. The questionnaire answers, combined with our specialists’ hands-on research, make up our proprietary assessment process that scores each provider’s performance.
The final output produces overall star ratings from poor (1 star) to excellent (5 stars). Ratings are rounded to the nearest half-star. These overall star ratings appear on roundup pages and the provider’s review.
We then undergo an additional evaluation process to create lists of the best crypto platforms for certain types of consumers. This evaluation adjusts the weighting of factors (and occasionally considers additional criteria) to emphasize features that matter most to the consumer targeted by the list — for example, our list of the best crypto platforms for staking and rewards heavily weights factors like the number of coins that can be staked. Because of this, a provider’s overall star rating is not always the primary factor that determines inclusion in lists or NerdWallet’s awards program.
Our writers and editors conduct crypto brokerage reviews on an annual basis. Throughout the year, we maintain contact with providers and update any changes to their offerings.
The weighting of each rating factor is based on our team’s assessment of which features are most important to consumers and which ones impact the consumer experience in the most meaningful way. We base much of our evaluation on Bitcoin, since that cryptocurrency has the largest market capitalization of those available through the providers we review. Providers earn an overall score based on the factors and weightings detailed on this page. However, as described above, the factors considered and how heavily those factors are weighted is then adjusted to create lists that target specific types of consumers.
The review team
The combined expertise of our investing team is infused into our review process to ensure thoughtful evaluation of products and services from the customer perspective. Our writers and editors together have more than 70 years of experience in writing about finance. Their former positions range from Wall Street Journal reporter to senior financial advisor at Merrill Lynch.
The review team comprises seasoned writers, researchers and editors who cover stocks, bonds, common funds, index funds, exchange-traded funds, alternative investments, socially responsible induct, fiscal advisors, retirement, and investing scheme. In addition to appearing on NerdWallet, the work of our team members has been published in The New York Times, The Washington Post, Forbes, USA Today, Bloomberg News, Nasdaq, MSN, MarketWatch, Yahoo Finance and other national and regional media outlets. Each writer and editor follows NerdWallet ’ s hard-and-fast guidelines for editorial integrity The aggregate expertness of our investing team is infused into our review work to ensure thoughtful evaluation of products and services from the customer perspective. Our writers and editors together have more than 70 years of experience in writing about finance. Their erstwhile positions range from Wall Street Journal reporter to senior fiscal adviser at Merrill Lynch .
This is the minimum amount a person must spend to buy and sell Bitcoin. If the trade minimum is $5 or less, it earns the highest rating. If the trade minimum is more than $50, it earns the lowest rating.
Trading and transaction fees
This category considers the following, weighted equally:
If the platform has no spot trading fee or spread when purchasing Bitcoin, it earns the highest rating. If that charge is 2% or more, it earns the lowest rating.
If a provider charges no transaction fee, it earns the highest rating. If the provider’s transaction fee is more than 2% based on $200 worth of Bitcoin, it earns the lowest rating.
If a provider charges no transaction fee to withdraw Bitcoin from the exchange to an outside wallet, it earns the highest rating. If a provider charges more than $60, it earns the lowest rating.
Number of cryptocurrencies offered
We consider how many cryptocurrencies each provider offers for trading. If a provider offers 31 or more cryptocurrencies, it earns the highest rating. If it offers four or fewer, it earns the lowest rating.
Crypto-to-crypto trading pairs
If a provider offers 16 or more crypto-to-crypto trading pairs, it earns the highest rating. If a provider offers no crypto-to-crypto trading pairs, it earns the lowest rating.
Digital wallet options
We consider whether a provider supports outside crypto wallets to store digital currency. If users can connect their own digital wallets, a provider earns the highest rating. If the provider does not allow this, it earns the lowest rating. Providers that allow transfer of cryptocurrency in-kind to another wallet earn three stars here.
Customer support options
If you can speak to a representative by phone, a provider earns the highest rating. If a provider offers only email communication, it earns the lowest rating.
We define website usability as how easy it is for our reviewers to find key details on the site. If we can find all information in under five minutes, a provider earns the highest rating. If we can’t find any information, the provider earns the lowest rating.
This category reflects how users review each provider’s Android and iOS mobile app in the respective app stores. If a provider’s user reviews average at least 4.5 stars, it earns the highest rating. If a provider’s user reviews are less than 2 stars, it earns the lowest rating.
Do you want to provide feedback? Contact us at
We consider the follow : If you can speak to a example by phone, a provider earns the highest rate. If a supplier offers only e-mail communication, it earns the lowest rating.We define web site serviceability as how easy it is for our reviewers to find cardinal details on the site. If we can find all information in under five minutes, a supplier earns the highest rat. If we can ’ t find any information, the supplier earns the lowest rating.This class reflects how users review each supplier ’ south Android and iOS mobile app in the respective app stores. If a supplier ’ second user review modal at least 4.5 stars, it earns the highest military rank. If a supplier ’ south user reviews are less than 2 stars, it earns the lowest rating.Do you want to provide feedback ? Contact us at [email protected]